Compare Peugeot 207 SW facelift vs Renault Megane 4 Grand Tour vs Renault Clio 4 Estate
Variants
1.4
1.4 VTi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 112PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 HDi 92PS
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi AT
1.2 Energy TCe 100PS
1.2 Energy TCe 130PS
1.2 Energy TCe 130PS AT
1.3 TCe 115PS
1.3 TCe 140PS
1.3 TCe 140PS AT
1.3 TCe 160PS
1.3 TCe 160PS AT
1.5 Blue dCi 115PS
1.5 Blue dCi 115PS AT
1.5 Blue dCi 95PS
1.5 Energy dCi 110PS
1.5 Energy dCi 110PS AT
1.5 Energy dCi 90PS
1.6 Energy dCi 130PS
1.6 SCe 115PS
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS AT
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS AT
GT 1.6 Energy dCi AT
GT 1.6 Energy TCe AT
0.9 Energy TCe
1.2
1.2 TCe AT
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi AT
1.5 Energy dCi
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
337 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1258 L / 44.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1527 mm / 60.1 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4164 mm / 163.9 in
4626 mm / 182.1 in
4267 mm / 168.0 in
Size | Width
1748 mm / 68.8 in | 1972 mm / 77.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1818 mm / 71.6 in (mirror folded)
1814 mm / 71.4 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1732 mm / 68.2 in
Track Width | Front
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1461.0 mm / 57.5 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2712 mm / 106.8 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2013
2013 ~ 2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
3%
14%
4%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Slightly cleaner design
- Very low official fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Not independent suspensions
- Very ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Not even fully independent suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.