Compare Ford Focus 3 Wagon facelift vs Kia Cee'd SW vs Kia Cee'd SW 2
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS stop&start
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS stop&start
1.5 TDCi 120PS
1.5 TDCi 95PS
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi 115PS
1.6 TDCi 115PS stop&start
1.6 TDCi 95PS
1.6 TDCi 95PS stop&start
1.6 Ti-VCT 105PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS AT
1.6 Ti-VCT 85PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT stop&start
2.0 TDCi 150PS stop&start
Focus ST
Focus ST Diesel
Focus ST stop&start
1.4
1.4 CVVT
1.6 CRDi 115PS
1.6 CRDi 115PS AT
1.6 CRDi 128PS
1.6 CRDi 128PS AT
1.6 CRDi 90PS 5MT
1.6 CRDi 90PS 6MT
1.6 CVVT
1.6 CVVT AT
1.6D
1.6D AT
2.0 CRDi 140PS
2.0 CVVT
2.0 CVVT AT
1.0 T-GDI 100PS
1.0 T-GDI 120PS
1.4 CRDi
1.4 CVVT
1.4 CVVT Euro6
1.6 CRDi 110PS
1.6 CRDi 128PS
1.6 CRDi 128PS AT
1.6 CRDI 136PS
1.6 CRDI 136PS DCT
1.6 GDi
1.6 GDI 135PS
1.6 GDI 135PS DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
476 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 1502 L / 53.0 cu-ft
534 L / 18.9 cu-ft ~ 1664 L / 58.8 cu-ft
528 L / 18.6 cu-ft ~ 1642 L / 58.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.9 L / 7.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.3 L / 5.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 280-300 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 262-284 mm
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4470 mm / 176.0 in
4505 mm / 177.4 in
Size | Width
1790 mm / 70.5 in
Track Width | Front
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheelbase
2648 mm / 104.3 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
D4FB
Reviews
Neofiliac score
37%
26%
31%
Pros
- Very low official fuel consumption
- Improved styling
- Higher output engines made available
- Small turning circle
- Down to very low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Further downsized engine lineup
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.