HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Focus 3 Wagon facelift vs Ford Mondeo 3 Wagon vs Ford Focus 3 Wagon

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS stop&start
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS stop&start
1.5 TDCi 120PS
1.5 TDCi 95PS
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi 115PS
1.6 TDCi 115PS stop&start
1.6 TDCi 95PS
1.6 TDCi 95PS stop&start
1.6 Ti-VCT 105PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS AT
1.6 Ti-VCT 85PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT stop&start
2.0 TDCi 150PS stop&start
Focus ST
Focus ST Diesel
Focus ST stop&start
1.6 110PS
1.6 125PS
2.0
2.0 TDCi 130PS
2.0 TDCi 140PS
2.2 TDCi
2.3
2.5
1.6 EcoBoost 150PS
1.6 EcoBoost 182PS
1.6 TDCi 115PS
1.6 TDCi 95PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 105PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS
2.0 TDCi 115PS AT
2.0 TDCi 140PS
2.0 TDCi 140PS AT
2.0 TDCi 163PS
2.0 TDCi 163PS AT
Focus ST

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
476 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 1502 L / 53.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1500 mm / 59.1 in
1505 mm / 59.3 in
Size | Width
1886 mm / 74.3 in
1823 mm / 71.8 in
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
Wheelbase
2648 mm / 104.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
26%
31%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Higher output engines made available
  • Volvo I5 engine was interesting
  • Rather reliable powertrain
  • Improved styling
  • Improved fit and finish
  • Higher engine outputs
Cons
  • Further downsized engine lineup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Design didn't age well
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.