Compare Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon vs Ford Focus 3 Wagon vs Kia Cee'd SW 2

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost AT
1.5 TDCi
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi
1.6 TDCi ECOnetic
2.0 EcoBoost 203PS AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AWD
2.0 TDCi 150PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS
2.0 TDCi 180PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 180PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS AWD AT
2.0 TDCi 210PS AT
1.6 EcoBoost 150PS
1.6 EcoBoost 182PS
1.6 TDCi 115PS
1.6 TDCi 95PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 105PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS
2.0 TDCi 115PS AT
2.0 TDCi 140PS
2.0 TDCi 140PS AT
2.0 TDCi 163PS
2.0 TDCi 163PS AT
Focus ST
1.0 T-GDI 100PS
1.0 T-GDI 120PS
1.4 CRDi
1.4 CVVT
1.4 CVVT Euro6
1.6 CRDi 110PS
1.6 CRDi 128PS
1.6 CRDi 128PS AT
1.6 CRDI 136PS
1.6 CRDI 136PS DCT
1.6 GDi
1.6 GDI 135PS
1.6 GDI 135PS DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1585 L / 56.0 cu-ft
528 L / 18.6 cu-ft ~ 1642 L / 58.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.9 L / 7.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.3 L / 5.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.5 L / 16.5 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 280-300 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc, 262-284 mm
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1501 mm / 59.1 in
1505 mm / 59.3 in
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4867 mm / 191.6 in
4505 mm / 177.4 in
Size | Width
1823 mm / 71.8 in
Track Width | Front
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
D4FB
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
31%
31%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Improved styling
  • Improved fit and finish
  • Higher engine outputs
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Engines are too small
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.