Compare Ford Mondeo 3 Wagon facelift vs Ford Focus 3 Wagon vs Kia Cee'd SW 2

Ford Mondeo 3 facelift Station Wagon (2010-2014)

Ford Focus 3 Wagon Station Wagon (2010-2014)

Kia Cee'd SW 2 (JD) Station Wagon (2012-2018)

Ford | Cars

Kia | Cars

Variants

1.6

1.6 EcoBoost

2.0

2.0 AT

2.0 EcoBoost AT

2.0 TDCi 115PS

2.0 TDCi 140PS

2.0 TDCi 140PS AT

2.0 TDCi 163PS

2.0 TDCi 163PS AT

2.2 TDCi 200PS

1.6 EcoBoost 150PS

1.6 EcoBoost 182PS

1.6 TDCi 115PS

1.6 TDCi 95PS

1.6 Ti-VCT 105PS

1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS

2.0 TDCi 115PS AT

2.0 TDCi 140PS

2.0 TDCi 140PS AT

2.0 TDCi 163PS

2.0 TDCi 163PS AT

Focus ST

1.0 T-GDI 100PS

1.0 T-GDI 120PS

1.4 CRDi

1.4 CVVT

1.4 CVVT Euro6

1.6 CRDi 110PS

1.6 CRDi 128PS

1.6 CRDi 128PS AT

1.6 CRDI 136PS

1.6 CRDI 136PS DCT

1.6 GDi

1.6 GDI 135PS

1.6 GDI 135PS DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

489 L / 17.3 cu-ft ~ 1680 L / 59.3 cu-ft

528 L / 18.6 cu-ft ~ 1642 L / 58.0 cu-ft

Coolant Capacity

6.9 L / 7.3 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

5.3 L / 5.6 qt

Fuel Capacity

70.0 L / 18.5 gal

53.0 L / 14.0 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Ventilated discs, 280-300 mm

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Disc, 262-284 mm

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Turning Circle

11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height

1512 mm / 59.5 in

1505 mm / 59.3 in

1485 mm / 58.5 in

Size | Length

4837 mm / 190.4 in

4505 mm / 177.4 in

Size | Width

1823 mm / 71.8 in

Track Width | Front

1588.0 mm / 62.5 in

1544.0 mm / 60.8 in

Track Width | Rear

1605.0 mm / 63.2 in

1534.0 mm / 60.4 in

Wheelbase

2850 mm / 112.2 in

2648 mm / 104.3 in

2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Engine

D4FB

Production

Availability

2010 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score

30%

31%

Pros

Engines with higher output

Improved styling
Improved fit and finish
Higher engine outputs

Down to very low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Questionable styling

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.