Compare Volvo XC70 II facelift vs Volvo V70 II vs Saab 9-3 SportCombi 2

Variants
D5
D5 AT
2.5T
2.5T AT
2.0T 180PS
2.0T 180PS AT
T5
T5 AT
2.4 140PS
2.4 140PS AT
2.4 170PS
2.4 170PS AT
2.4 Bi-Fuel
2.4D 130PS
2.4D 163PS
2.4T
2.4T AT
2.4T AWD
2.4T AWD AT
2.5D
2.5T
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
R AWD
R AWD AT
1.8i
1.8t 150PS
1.8t 150PS AT
1.8t BioPower
1.9 TiD 120PS
1.9 TiD 150PS
1.9 TTiD 180PS
1.9 TTiD 180PS AT
2.0T
2.0t 150PS
2.0t 150PS AT
2.0t 175PS
2.0t 175PS AT
2.0T AT
2.0t BioPower 200PS
2.0t BioPower 200PS AT
2.8T V6 230PS
2.8T V6 250PS
2.8T V6 250PS AT
2.8T V6 280PS
2.8T V6 280PS AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
485 L / 17.1 cu-ft ~ 1641 L / 58.0 cu-ft
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft ~ 1273 L / 45.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/65 R16
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
1507 mm / 59.3 in
Size | Length
4733 mm / 186.3 in
4710 mm / 185.4 in
4654 mm / 183.2 in
Size | Width
1860 mm / 73.2 in
1804 mm / 71.0 in
1782 mm / 70.2 in
Track Width | Front
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1548.0 mm / 60.9 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheel Size
7J x 16
Wheelbase
2763 mm / 108.8 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine | Compression Ratio
17.3:1
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2008

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
27%
65%
Pros
  • Some basic offroad capability
  • AWD is standard
  • Good I5 engines
  • Interesting all-I5 engine lineup
  • Rather reliable
  • Superb blend of elegance and sportiness
  • Rather potent engines
  • Good manual transmissions
Cons
  • Horribly ugly
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Black plastic trim
  • MacPherson front suspensions
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.