Compare Opel Astra J Sports Tourer vs Chevrolet HHR vs Opel Vectra C Caravan
Variants
1.3 CDTI
1.4
1.4 87PS
1.4 LPG 140PS
1.4 Turbo 120PS
1.4 Turbo 140PS
1.4 Turbo 140PS AT
1.6 5MT
1.6 6MT
1.6 AT
1.6 CDTI 110PS
1.6 CDTI 136PS
1.6 Turbo
1.6 Turbo 170PS
1.6 Turbo 170PS AT
1.6 Turbo 180PS
1.6 Turbo AT
1.7 CDTI 100PS
1.7 CDTI 110PS
1.7 CDTI 110PS ecoFLEX
1.7 CDTI 125PS
1.7 CDTI 130PS
1.7 CDTI 130PS ecoFLEX
2.0 CDTI 160PS
2.0 CDTI 160PS AT
2.0 CDTI 165PS
2.0 CDTI 165PS AT
2.0 CDTI BiTurbo
2.2
2.2 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
1.6
1.8 122PS
1.8 122PS AT
1.8 140PS
1.9 CDTI 120PS
1.9 CDTI 150PS
2.0 DTI
2.0 Turbo
2.2 DTI
2.2 DTI AT
2.2 DIRECT
2.2 DIRECT Automatic
2.8 Turbo 230PS
2.8 250PS
3.0 CDTI 184PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS AT
3.2 211PS AT
3.2 211PS
OPC 2.8 Turbo
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
638 L / 22.5 cu-ft ~ 1785 L / 63.0 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1850 L / 65.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
56.0 L / 14.8 gal
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Platform
GM Epsilon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1535 mm / 60.4 in
1603 mm / 63.1 in
Size | Length
4698 mm / 185.0 in
4475 mm / 176.2 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1798 mm / 70.8 in
Track Width | Front
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
1536.0 mm / 60.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheel Size
6.5J X 16
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2628 mm / 103.5 in
2830 mm / 111.4 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
222 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2011
Reviews
Neofiliac score
18%
1%
27%
Pros
- Rather handsome
- Lots of engine options
- Nothing
- Better-looking than the sedan
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Only available with small engines
- Semi-independent rear suspensions
- Exceptionally ugly
- No powerful engine options
- No independent suspensions
- Outdated transmissions
- Semi-independent suspensions in the rear
- Use of CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.