Compare Subaru Legacy 5 Wagon vs Mazda 6 Wagon facelift vs Acura TSX Sport Wagon

Variants
2.0d
2.0d sport
2.0 CVT
2.5 GT
2.5 CVT
2.5 sport CVT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 CD 121PS
2.0 CD 143PS
2.3
2.3 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
526 L / 18.6 cu-ft ~ 1660 L / 58.6 cu-ft
505 L / 17.8 cu-ft ~ 1712 L / 60.5 cu-ft
892 L / 31.5 cu-ft ~ 1875 L / 66.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.3 L / 6.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
P225/50 R17 93V
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1535 mm / 60.4 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4775 mm / 188.0 in
4710 mm / 185.4 in
4805 mm / 189.2 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
1780 mm / 70.1 in
1840 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Weight
1626.0 kg / 3584.7 lbs
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Fuel Economy
9.4 L/100km / 25.0 MPG (combined) | 10.7 L/100km / 22.0 MPG (urban) | 7.8 L/100km / 30.2 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine
K24Z3
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Power
201.0 hp / 149.9 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Torque
230 Nm / 169.6 lb-ft @ 4300 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2014
2005 ~ 2008
2010 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
59%
57%
30%
Pros
  • Very elegant, clean design
  • Great flat engines, including a larger 3.6L H6
  • Manual transmissions still available
  • Symmetric AWD system
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Reliable engines
  • Gorgeous design
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Rather elegantly design
Cons
  • Still uses MacPherson strut front suspension
  • H6 engine stuck with 5-speed auto
  • CVT
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • No powerful engine options
  • Why not buy a Honda with V6 in it?

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.