Compare Subaru Legacy 3 Wagon vs Ford Mondeo 3 Wagon facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon

Subaru Legacy 3 (BH) Station Wagon (1998-2003)

Ford Mondeo 3 facelift Station Wagon (2010-2014)

Subaru | Cars

Ford | Cars

Variants

2.0

2.0 AT

2.5

2.5 AT

1.6

1.6 EcoBoost

2.0

2.0 AT

2.0 EcoBoost AT

2.0 TDCi 115PS

2.0 TDCi 140PS

2.0 TDCi 140PS AT

2.0 TDCi 163PS

2.0 TDCi 163PS AT

2.2 TDCi 200PS

1.0 EcoBoost

1.5 EcoBoost

1.5 EcoBoost AT

1.5 TDCi

1.5 TDCi ECOnetic

1.6 TDCi

1.6 TDCi ECOnetic

2.0 EcoBoost 203PS AT

2.0 EcoBoost 240PS AT

2.0 TDCi 150PS

2.0 TDCi 150PS AWD

2.0 TDCi 150PS ECOnetic

2.0 TDCi 150PS AT

2.0 TDCi 180PS

2.0 TDCi 180PS ECOnetic

2.0 TDCi 180PS AT

2.0 TDCi 180PS AWD AT

2.0 TDCi 210PS AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

528 L / 18.6 cu-ft ~ 1646 L / 58.1 cu-ft

489 L / 17.3 cu-ft ~ 1680 L / 59.3 cu-ft

488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1585 L / 56.0 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

64.0 L / 16.9 gal

70.0 L / 18.5 gal

62.5 L / 16.5 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Tire Size

215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19

Turning Circle

11.5 m / 37.7 ft

11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

165 mm / 6.5 in

128 mm / 5.0 in

Size | Height

1515 mm / 59.6 in

1512 mm / 59.5 in

1501 mm / 59.1 in

Size | Length

4680 mm / 184.3 in

4837 mm / 190.4 in

4867 mm / 191.6 in

Track Width | Front

1460.0 mm / 57.5 in

1588.0 mm / 62.5 in

1599.0 mm / 63.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1455.0 mm / 57.3 in

1605.0 mm / 63.2 in

1595.0 mm / 62.8 in

Wheel Size

6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19

Wheelbase

2650 mm / 104.3 in

2850 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.0:1

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Production

Availability

1998 ~ 2003

2010 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score

40%

30%

32%

Pros

Elegant proportions
Symmetric AWD + flat-4 layout
New flat-6 engine

Engines with higher output

Low official fuel consumption
Improved styling

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Questionable styling

Engines are too small
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.