Compare Skoda Octavia 2 Scout (1Z) vs Skoda Fabia 3 Combi (NJ) vs Renault Clio 4 facelift

Skoda Octavia 2 Scout (1Z)

Skoda Fabia 3 Combi (NJ)

Renault Clio 4 facelift

Skoda Octavia 2 Scout (1Z)Skoda Fabia 3 Combi (NJ)Renault Clio 4 facelift
Variants
2.0 FSI
2.0 TDI
1.0
1.0 TSI 110PS
1.0 TSI 110PS DSG
1.0 TSI 95PS
1.2 TSI 110PS
1.2 TSI 110PS DSG
1.2 TSI 90PS
1.4 TDI 105PS
1.4 TDI 90PS
1.4 TDI 90PS DSG
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 75
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 90

Reviews

Neofiliac score19%6%12%
Pros
  • Some recycled black plastic are used
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Stuck with semi-independent suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Ugly
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.