Compare Skoda Octavia 3 Combi vs Skoda Fabia 2 Combi vs Peugeot 207 SW facelift

Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.2 TSI 105PS
1.2 TSI 105PS DSG
1.2 TSI 86PS
1.4 G-TEC
1.4 G-TEC DSG
1.4 TSI 140PS
1.4 TSI 140PS DSG
1.4 TSI 150PS
1.4 TSI 150PS DSG
1.6 TDI 105PS 4x4
1.6 TDI 105PS
1.6 TDI 105PS DSG
1.6 TDI 110PS
1.6 TDI 110PS 4x4
1.6 TDI 110PS DSG
1.6 TDI 110PS GreenLine
1.6 TDI 90PS
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI 4x4 DSG
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 150PS 4x4
2.0 TDI 150PS
2.0 TDI 150PS DSG
2.0 TDI 184PS 4x4 DSG
RS 2.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TDI DSG
RS 2.0 TFSI 220PS
RS 2.0 TFSI 220PS DSG
RS 2.0 TFSI 230PS
RS 2.0 TFSI 230PS DSG
1.2 MPI 60PS
1.2 MPI 70PS
1.4 MPI
1.4 TDI 70PS
1.4 TDI 80PS
1.4 TDI DPF
1.6 MPI
1.6 MPI AT
1.9 TDI
1.4
1.4 VTi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 112PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 HDi 92PS
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
337 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1258 L / 44.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.0 m / 32.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
1527 mm / 60.1 in
Size | Length
4239 mm / 166.9 in
4164 mm / 163.9 in
Size | Width
1814 mm / 71.4 in
1642 mm / 64.6 in
1748 mm / 68.8 in | 1972 mm / 77.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1818 mm / 71.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1461.0 mm / 57.5 in
Wheel Size
5J x 14, 6J x 14, 6J x 15
Wheelbase
2462 mm / 96.9 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
0.3
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4

Production

Availability
2007 ~ 2010
2009 ~ 2013

Reviews

Neofiliac score
21%
6%
3%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Slightly cleaner design
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No fully independent suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Not independent suspensions
  • Very ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.