Compare Skoda Fabia 3 Combi (NJ) facelift vs Renault Clio 4 facelift vs Renault Megane 3 Grand Tour

Skoda Fabia 3 Combi (NJ) facelift

Renault Clio 4 facelift

Renault Megane 3 Grand Tour

Skoda Fabia 3 Combi (NJ) faceliftRenault Clio 4 faceliftRenault Megane 3 Grand Tour
Variants
1.0 MPI 60PS
1.0 MPI 75PS
1.0 TSI 110PS
1.0 TSI 110PS DSG
1.0 TSI 95PS
1.0 TSI 95PS DSG
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 75
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 90
1.2 Energy TCe 115
1.2 Energy TCe 115 Stop&Start
1.2 Energy TCe 130 Stop&Start
1.2 TCe 130 Stop&Start AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 110 Stop&Start
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.5 Energy dCi 110 Stop&Start
1.5 Energy dCi 130 Stop&Start
1.6 100
1.6 110
1.6 110 Ethanol
1.6 Energy dCi 130 Stop&Start
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
2.0 dCi 150 AT
GT 2.0 dCi
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 2.0 TCe 190 Stop&Start
GT 2.0 TCe 220 Stop&Start

Reviews

Neofiliac score4%12%13%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Easy to DIY
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Stuck with semi-independent suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Ugly
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.