Compare Skoda Fabia 3 Combi (NJ) facelift vs Renault Megane 4 Grand Tour vs Renault Clio 4 facelift

Skoda Fabia 3 Combi (NJ) facelift

Renault Megane 4 Grand Tour

Renault Clio 4 facelift

Skoda Fabia 3 Combi (NJ) faceliftRenault Megane 4 Grand TourRenault Clio 4 facelift
Variants
1.0 MPI 60PS
1.0 MPI 75PS
1.0 TSI 110PS
1.0 TSI 110PS DSG
1.0 TSI 95PS
1.0 TSI 95PS DSG
1.2 Energy TCe 100PS
1.2 Energy TCe 130PS
1.2 Energy TCe 130PS AT
1.3 TCe 115PS
1.3 TCe 140PS
1.3 TCe 140PS AT
1.3 TCe 160PS
1.3 TCe 160PS AT
1.5 Blue dCi 115PS
1.5 Blue dCi 115PS AT
1.5 Blue dCi 95PS
1.5 Energy dCi 110PS
1.5 Energy dCi 110PS AT
1.5 Energy dCi 90PS
1.6 Energy dCi 130PS
1.6 SCe 115PS
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS AT
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS AT
GT 1.6 Energy dCi AT
GT 1.6 Energy TCe AT
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 75
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 90

Reviews

Neofiliac score4%14%12%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Stuck with semi-independent suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Ugly
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.