HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Fabia 3 Combi facelift vs Renault Talisman Grandtour vs Renault Clio 4 Wagon facelift

Variants
1.0 MPI 60PS
1.0 MPI 75PS
1.0 TSI 110PS
1.0 TSI 110PS DSG
1.0 TSI 95PS
1.0 TSI 95PS DSG
1.3 TCe 4CONTROL AT
1.3 TCe AT
1.5 ENERGY dCi 110PS
1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS
1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS AT
1.6 ENERGY dCi 160PS AT
1.6 ENERGY TCe 150PS AT
1.6 ENERGY TCe 200PS AT
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS 4CONTROL
1.8 TCe 225PS 4CONTROL AT
1.8 TCe 225PS AT
2.0 Blue dCi 160PS 4CONTROL AT
2.0 Blue dCi 160PS AT
2.0 Blue dCi 200PS 4CONTROL AT
2.0 Blue dCi 200PS AT
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 75
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 90

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1395 L / 49.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/45 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1467 mm / 57.8 in
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4262 mm / 167.8 in
4866 mm / 191.6 in
4267 mm / 168.0 in
Size | Width
1732 mm / 68.2 in
1870 mm / 73.6 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1890 mm / 74.4 in (mirror folded)
1732 mm / 68.2 in | 1945 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1609.0 mm / 63.3 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheel Size
7, 0J x 16
Wheelbase
2470 mm / 97.2 in
2809 mm / 110.6 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
76.4 mm / 3.0 in
73.1 mm / 2.9 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
4%
21%
12%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Looks better than the car is
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Stuck with semi-independent suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Horrible performance
  • Ugly
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.