Compare Skoda Fabia 2 Combi (5J) facelift vs Renault Megane 3 Grand Tour vs Renault Clio 4 facelift

Skoda Fabia 2 Combi (5J) facelift

Renault Megane 3 Grand Tour

Renault Clio 4 facelift

Skoda Fabia 2 Combi (5J) faceliftRenault Megane 3 Grand TourRenault Clio 4 facelift
Variants
1.2 60PS
1.2 70PS
1.2 TDI
1.2 TSI 105PS
1.2 TSI 105PS DSG
1.2 TSI 86PS
1.4
1.6 TDI 105PS
1.6 TDI 75PS
1.6 TDI 90PS
RS 1.4 TSI
1.2 Energy TCe 115
1.2 Energy TCe 115 Stop&Start
1.2 Energy TCe 130 Stop&Start
1.2 TCe 130 Stop&Start AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 110 Stop&Start
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.5 Energy dCi 110 Stop&Start
1.5 Energy dCi 130 Stop&Start
1.6 100
1.6 110
1.6 110 Ethanol
1.6 Energy dCi 130 Stop&Start
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
2.0 dCi 150 AT
GT 2.0 dCi
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 2.0 TCe 190 Stop&Start
GT 2.0 TCe 220 Stop&Start
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 75
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 90

Reviews

Neofiliac score7%13%12%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Easy to DIY
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with semi-independent suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Ugly
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.