Compare Skoda Fabia 2 Combi vs Renault Talisman Grandtour vs Renault Clio 4 Estate
Variants
1.2 MPI 60PS
1.2 MPI 70PS
1.4 MPI
1.4 TDI 70PS
1.4 TDI 80PS
1.4 TDI DPF
1.6 MPI
1.6 MPI AT
1.9 TDI
1.3 TCe 4CONTROL AT
1.3 TCe AT
1.5 ENERGY dCi 110PS
1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS
1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS AT
1.6 ENERGY dCi 160PS AT
1.6 ENERGY TCe 150PS AT
1.6 ENERGY TCe 200PS AT
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS 4CONTROL
1.8 TCe 225PS 4CONTROL AT
1.8 TCe 225PS AT
2.0 Blue dCi 160PS 4CONTROL AT
2.0 Blue dCi 160PS AT
2.0 Blue dCi 200PS 4CONTROL AT
2.0 Blue dCi 200PS AT
0.9 Energy TCe
1.2
1.2 TCe AT
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi AT
1.5 Energy dCi
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.0 m / 32.8 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4239 mm / 166.9 in
4866 mm / 191.6 in
4267 mm / 168.0 in
Size | Width
1642 mm / 64.6 in
1870 mm / 73.6 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1890 mm / 74.4 in (mirror folded)
1732 mm / 68.2 in
Track Width | Front
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1609.0 mm / 63.3 in
Wheel Size
5J x 14, 6J x 14, 6J x 15
Wheelbase
2462 mm / 96.9 in
2809 mm / 110.6 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2010
2013 ~ 2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
6%
21%
4%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Very low official fuel consumption
- Looks better than the car is
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No fully independent suspensions
- Ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Not even fully independent suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.