Compare Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports vs Renault Megane 3 Grand Tour vs Renault Laguna 3 Estate

Variants
1.3 Dual VVT-i
1.4 D-4D
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 VVT-i Hybrid
2.0 D-4D
1.2 Energy TCe 115
1.2 Energy TCe 115 Stop&Start
1.2 Energy TCe 130 Stop&Start
1.2 TCe 130 Stop&Start AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 110 Stop&Start
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.5 Energy dCi 110 Stop&Start
1.5 Energy dCi 130 Stop&Start
1.6 100
1.6 110
1.6 110 Ethanol
1.6 Energy dCi 130 Stop&Start
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
2.0 dCi 150 AT
GT 2.0 dCi
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 2.0 TCe 190 Stop&Start
GT 2.0 TCe 220 Stop&Start
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro5
1.5 dCi AT
1.6
2.0 140PS
2.0 140PS Euro5
2.0 Turbo AT
2.0 dCi 130PS Euro5
2.0 dCi 130PS
2.0 dCi 150PS
2.0 dCi 150PS AT
2.0 dCi 173PS
2.0 dCi 178PS AT
GT 150PS
GT 173PS AT
GT 173PS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
524 L / 18.5 cu-ft ~ 1595 L / 56.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.1 m / 36.2 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4560 mm / 179.5 in
4559 mm / 179.5 in
4803 mm / 189.1 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1811 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2703 mm / 106.4 in
2756 mm / 108.5 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
88 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5 J
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
28%
13%
19%
Pros
  • Good for fuel costs
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Easy to DIY
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No fully independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.