Compare Saab 9-5 II vs Citroen C5 I facelift vs Citroen C6
Variants
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.8T XWD AT
1.6 HDi
1.8 116hp
1.8 125hp
2.0 HDi
2.0 HDi AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2 HDi AT
2.2 HDi Biturbo
2.2 HDi Biturbo AT
3.0 AT
2.2 HDi MT
2.2 HDi
2.7 HDi
3.0 HDi
3.0
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
513 L / 18.1 cu-ft
471 L / 16.6 cu-ft ~ 1315 L / 46.4 cu-ft
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
455 kg / 1003 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.8 ft
12.4 m / 40.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
GM Epsilon II LWB
PSA PF3
Dimensions
Size | Height
1466 mm / 57.7 in
1476 mm / 58.1 in
1464 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
5009 mm / 197.2 in
4745 mm / 186.8 in
4908 mm / 193.2 in
Size | Width
2113 mm / 83.2 in
1780 mm / 70.1 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1528.0 mm / 60.2 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Weight
1885.0 kg / 4155.7 lbs
Wheelbase
2837 mm / 111.7 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2900 mm / 114.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
13.8 L/100km / 17.0 MPG (urban) | 8.7 L/100km / 27.0 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2011
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
8%
52%
Pros
- Styling ahead of its time
- Good fit and finish
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good appointments inside
- New 6-speed auto gearbox
- Gorgeous styling (albeit unique)
- Hydractive 3 hydraulic suspension
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front with semi-independent suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Unreliable engines
- Interior fit and finish not the best
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.