Compare Opel Vectra C vs Opel Astra H Sedan vs Skoda Rapid

Opel Vectra / Chevrolet Vectra / Holden Vectra / Vauxhall Vectra C Sedan (2002-2008)

Opel Astra / Chevrolet Astra / Vauxhall Astra H (A04) Sedan (2004-2010)

Opel | Cars

Skoda | Cars

Variants

1.6 105PS

1.6 Ecotec 100PS

1.8 140PS

1.8 140PS AT

1.8 Ecotect 122PS AT

1.9 CDTI 120PS

1.9 CDTI 150PS

1.9 CDTI 150PS AT

2.0 DTI 100PS

2.0 Turbo 175PS

2.2 155PS

2.2 AT

2.2 DTI 125PS

2.2 DTI 125PS AT

2.2 Ecotec 147PS

2.2 Ecotec 147PS AT

2.8 Turbo 230PS

2.8 Turbo 230PS AT

2.8 Turbo 250PS

2.8 Turbo 250PS AT

3.0 CDTI 177PS

3.0 CDTI 177PS AT

3.0 CDTI 184PS

3.0 CDTI 184PS AT

3.2 211PS

3.2 211PS AT

1.3 CDTI

1.6 115PS

1.6 115PS AT

1.7 CDTI 100PS

1.7 CDTI 110PS

1.8 140PS

1.8 140PS AT

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 95

1.0 TSI 95 AT

1.2 MPI 75

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 110

1.2 TSI 85

1.2 TSI 90

1.2 TSI 90 DSG

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 AT

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TSI 122

1.4 TSI 125 AT

1.4 TSI 125 DSG

1.6 MPI 110

1.6 MPI 110 AT

1.6 MPI 90

1.6 TDI 115

1.6 TDI 116

1.6 TDI 105

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

550 L / 19.4 cu-ft ~ 1490 L / 52.6 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

61.0 L / 16.1 gal

52.0 L / 13.7 gal

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

14.0 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

12.3 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent

Rigid axle

Semi-independent, Torsion

Turning Circle

10.0 m / 32.8 ft

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style

4-door Sedan

5-door Hatchback

Platform

Epsilon

Delta platform

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

170 mm / 6.7 in

136 mm / 5.4 in

Size | Height

1460 mm / 57.5 in

1458 mm / 57.4 in

1461 mm / 57.5 in

Size | Length

4587 mm / 180.6 in

4483 mm / 176.5 in

Size | Width

1798 mm / 70.8 in

Track Width | Front

1488.0 mm / 58.6 in

Track Width | Rear

1525.0 mm / 60.0 in

1479.0 mm / 58.2 in

Wheelbase

2700 mm / 106.3 in

2703 mm / 106.4 in

2602 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.30

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score

12%

13%

Pros

Decent exterior design
Small turning circle

Not very ugly

Low official fuel consumption

Cons

Basic suspension set
Poor engine lineup
Bad reputation for reliability

Horrible 0-100kph time
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
Solid axle on the back

Bad 0-100kph time
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No fully independent suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.