Compare Opel Vectra C vs Ford Fusion vs Ford Taurus 5

Variants
1.6 105PS
1.6 Ecotec 100PS
1.8 140PS
1.8 140PS AT
1.8 Ecotect 122PS AT
1.9 CDTI 120PS
1.9 CDTI 150PS
1.9 CDTI 150PS AT
2.0 DTI 100PS
2.0 Turbo 175PS
2.2 155PS
2.2 AT
2.2 DTI 125PS
2.2 DTI 125PS AT
2.2 Ecotec 147PS
2.2 Ecotec 147PS AT
2.8 Turbo 230PS
2.8 Turbo 230PS AT
2.8 Turbo 250PS
2.8 Turbo 250PS AT
3.0 CDTI 177PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS AT
3.0 CDTI 184PS
3.0 CDTI 184PS AT
3.2 211PS
3.2 211PS AT
2.3
3.0
FWD
AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
448 L / 15.8 cu-ft
600 L / 21.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Helical spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/60 R16
225/55 R18
Turning Circle
10.0 m / 32.8 ft
12.5 m / 41.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Epsilon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1417 mm / 55.8 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4831 mm / 190.2 in
5126 mm / 201.8 in
Size | Width
1798 mm / 70.8 in
1834 mm / 72.2 in
1892 mm / 74.5 in
Track Width | Front
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
1636.0 mm / 64.4 in
Wheel Size
16 in
18 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2728 mm / 107.4 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Power
263.0 hp / 196.1 kW @ 6250 rpm
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
75.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
338 Nm / 249.3 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2009
2007 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
8%
21%
Pros
  • Decent exterior design
  • Small turning circle
  • Handsome exterior design
  • Moved up in size class compared to Gen4
  • Comfortable ride
Cons
  • Basic suspension set
  • Poor engine lineup
  • Bad reputation for reliability
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring exterior and interior
  • Poor handling
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.