Compare Citroen C5 I vs Alfa Romeo 166 facelift vs Citroen C6

Variants
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0 HDi 110hp
2.0 HDi 110hp AT
2.0 HDi 90hp
2.0 HPi
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2 HDi FAP
2.2 HDi FAP AT
3.0
3.0 AT
2.0 TS
2.4 JTD 10V
2.4 JTD 20V
2.4 JTD 20V AT
2.5 V6
3.0 V6 AT
3.2 V6
2.2 HDi MT
2.2 HDi
2.7 HDi
3.0 HDi
3.0

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
456 L / 16.1 cu-ft
490 L / 17.3 cu-ft
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
PSA PF3

Dimensions

Size | Height
1476 mm / 58.1 in
1416 mm / 55.7 in
1464 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4618 mm / 181.8 in
4720 mm / 185.8 in
4908 mm / 193.2 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 2100 mm / 82.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1800 mm / 70.9 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2900 mm / 114.2 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Euro 4
Engine | Redline
5300 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
7%
43%
52%
Pros
  • Cheap when used
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Improved exterior design
  • Improved engine lineup
  • Gorgeous styling (albeit unique)
  • Hydractive 3 hydraulic suspension
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front and semi-independent suspensions on the rear
  • Less well appointed than many competitors
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Unreliable engines
  • Interior fit and finish not the best

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.