HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Citroen C6 vs Audi A6 C7 facelift vs Citroen C6

Variants
2.2 HDi MT
2.2 HDi
2.7 HDi
3.0 HDi
3.0
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI ultra DCT
2.0 TDI quattro DCT
2.0 TDI ultra 150PS
2.0 TDI ultra 150PS DCT
2.0 TDI ultra 190PS
2.0 TDI ultra 190PS DCT
2.0 TFSI 252PS DCT
2.0 TFSI 252PS quattro DCT
3.0 TDI clean diesel 218PS DCT
3.0 TDI clean diesel 218PS quattro DCT
3.0 TDI clean diesel 272PS quattro DCT
3.0 TDI clean diesel 320PS quattro AT
3.0 TFSI quattro DCT
Competition 3.0 TDI quattro AT
2.2 HDi MT
2.2 HDi
2.7 HDi
3.0 HDi
3.0

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 995 L / 35.1 cu-ft
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Independent on trapezoidal lever
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.8 ft
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
12.4 m / 40.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
PSA PF3
PSA PF3

Dimensions

Size | Height
1464 mm / 57.6 in
1455 mm / 57.3 in
1464 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4908 mm / 193.2 in
4933 mm / 194.2 in
4908 mm / 193.2 in
Size | Width
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1874 mm / 73.8 in | 2086 mm / 82.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1627.0 mm / 64.1 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2900 mm / 114.2 in
2912 mm / 114.6 in
2900 mm / 114.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
52%
62%
52%
Pros
  • Gorgeous styling (albeit unique)
  • Hydractive 3 hydraulic suspension
  • Great suspension setup
  • Good exterior and interior styling
  • No more CVT headaches
  • Up to 650Nm of torque
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Gorgeous styling (albeit unique)
  • Hydractive 3 hydraulic suspension
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Unreliable engines
  • Interior fit and finish not the best
  • Engine dependability still a question mark, notably the FSI units
  • Manual transmission had limited availability
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Unreliable engines
  • Interior fit and finish not the best

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.