Compare Chrysler 300M vs Toyota Avalon 5 (XX50) vs Chrysler 200 (JS)

Chrysler 300M

Toyota Avalon 5 (XX50)

Chrysler 200 (JS)

Chrysler 300MToyota Avalon 5 (XX50)Chrysler 200 (JS)
Variants
2.7
3.5
2.5 Hybrid
3.5
2.4 6AT
2.4 4AT
3.6 6AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score17%46%15%
Pros
  • Fully-independent suspensions
  • Decent power
  • Handsome styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior space
  • Exceptional reliability
  • No longer strange looking
Cons
  • Outdated transmission
  • Questionable design language
  • Average build quality
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Unreliable powertrain
  • Outdated engine and transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.