Compare Jaguar S-Type X200 vs Jaguar XF X260 vs Alfa Romeo 166 (936) facelift

Jaguar S-Type X200

Jaguar XF X260

Alfa Romeo 166 (936) facelift

Jaguar S-Type X200Jaguar XF X260Alfa Romeo 166 (936) facelift
Variants
2.5 V6 AT
2.5 V6 MT
3.0 V6 AT
3.0 V6 MT
S-Type R
V6 Diesel AT
V6 Diesel MT
V8 5AT
V8 6AT
20d
20d AWD
20d Euro6d
20d Euro6d AWD
20d Euro6d MT
20d MHEV
20d MHEV AWD
20d MT
20t
25d
25d AWD
25d Euro6d AWD
25t
25t AWD
25t Euro6d
25t Euro6d AWD
25t Euro6d TEMP
30d
30d AWD
30t AWD
30t AWD
30t Euro6d AWD
35t
35t AWD
E-Performance
E-Performance Euro6d
E-Performance Euro6d MT
E-Performance MT
XF S
XF S AWD
2.0 TS
2.4 JTD 10V
2.4 JTD 20V
2.4 JTD 20V AT
2.5 V6
3.0 V6 AT
3.2 V6

Reviews

Neofiliac score61%71%43%
Pros
  • Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
  • Great handling characteristics
  • Good supercharged V6
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Improved exterior design
  • Improved engine lineup
Cons
  • Somewhat quirky styling
  • Unreliable drivetrain
  • Poor reliability
  • Bland styling
  • Less well appointed than many competitors

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.