Compare Infiniti Q70 / M-Series IV / Nissan Cima / Fuga (Y51) vs Infiniti Q50 facelift vs Infiniti M-Series II / Nissan Cedric / Gloria (Y34)

Infiniti Q70 / M-Series IV / Nissan Cima / Fuga (Y51)

Infiniti Q50 facelift

Infiniti M-Series II / Nissan Cedric / Gloria (Y34)

Infiniti Q70 / M-Series IV / Nissan Cima / Fuga (Y51)Infiniti Q50 faceliftInfiniti M-Series II / Nissan Cedric / Gloria (Y34)
Variants
M30d
M35h
M37
M37x
M56
M56x
2.0t AT
2.2d
2.2d AT
3.0t 300 AWD AT
3.0t 400 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD AT
S 3.0t AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score87%79%68%
Pros
  • Powerful and reliable NA V6 and V8 engines
  • Fantastic styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • RWD as standard (though lots of AWD nonsense was sold)
  • Great suspension setup
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Above average styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Rather good styling (rare for Infiniti of the era)
  • Powerful VK45DE 4.5L V8
Cons
  • Getting dirty with diesel and hybrid
  • Series discontinued
  • Little improvement over pre-facelift
  • Hybrid nonsense
  • MacPherson strut front suspension
  • Confusing model names

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.