Compare Acura TSX vs Chrysler Sebring Sedan JR vs Chrysler 300M
Variants
AT
MT
2.0
2.0 5MT
2.4
2.7
2.7
3.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
354 L / 12.5 cu-ft
475 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
215/50 R17
225/55 R17
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler LH
Dimensions
Size | Height
1456 mm / 57.3 in
1420 mm / 55.9 in
Size | Length
4657 mm / 183.3 in
5000 mm / 196.9 in
Size | Width
1762 mm / 69.4 in
1920 mm / 75.6 in
Track Width | Front
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Weight
1495.0 kg / 3295.9 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.5 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.1 sec
Top Speed
215.0 km/h / 133.6 mph
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine
K24A2
ECC
Engine | Bore
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
9.9:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 143.7 cu-in / 2354.0 cc
Engine | Power
203.0 hp / 151.4 kW @ 6800 rpm
Engine | Redline
6464 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
86.2 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
99.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
225 Nm / 166.0 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2003 ~ 2008
1998 ~ 2004
Reviews
Neofiliac score
25%
12%
17%
Pros
- Good suspension setup
- Sweet manual transmission
- Fine VTEC engine
- Chrysler continued to improve it till the end
- Fully-independent suspensions
- Decent power
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Bad automatic transmission
- Result of badge engineering
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Outdated transmission
- Questionable design language
- Average build quality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.