Compare Lexus LS430 UCF31 vs Lexus GS 4 facelift vs Lexus LS 5

Variants
LS430 EU
LS430 US
GS 200t
GS 300
GS 300h
GS 350
GS 350 AWD
GS 450h
GS F
LS 500
LS 500 AWD
LS 500h

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
570 L / 20.1 cu-ft
396 L / 14.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
84.0 L / 22.2 gal
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 315 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 310 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/55 R17
245/45 R20, 275/40 R20
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
Platform
TNGA: GA-L

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
5235 mm / 206.1 in
Size | Width
1830 mm / 72.0 in
1900 mm / 74.8 in
Track Width | Front
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17
20 in
Wheelbase
2925 mm / 115.2 in
3125 mm / 123.0 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
270 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6
Engine
3UZ-FE
Engine | Bore
91.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
4.3 L / 262.0 cu-in / 4293.0 cc
3.5 L / 210.9 cu-in / 3456.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Stroke
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
10-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
82%
88%
68%
Pros
  • Exceptionally robust powertrain
  • Simple yet elegant styling
  • Good fit and finish
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
  • Exceptionally styling
  • Down to 4.6s 0-100kph time
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Great V8 in the GS F
  • Exceptionally reliable
  • Comfortable yet good-handling multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Imposing styling
Cons
  • Starting to be down on power compared to its European competition
  • Uninspiring I4 engine found its way to the mix
  • Too many hybrids sold
  • No SWB vehicle
  • No V8
  • Hybrid transmission became too complex
  • Arguably too many gears

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.