Compare Toyota Camry 5 vs Toyota Avensis 2 vs Toyota Avalon 1
Variants
2.4 152hp
2.4 152hp AT
2.4 157hp
2.4 157hp AT
3.0 186hp AT
3.0 192hp AT
3.0 210hp AT
3.3 225hp AT
1.6
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D
2.2D 148hp
2.2D 175hp
2.4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.3 L / 9.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Helical spring
Tire Size
205/65 R15 H
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
137 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4630 mm / 182.3 in
4845 mm / 190.7 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Weight
1470.0 kg / 3240.8 lbs
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
10.5 L/100km / 22.4 MPG (combined)
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Engine
1MZ-FE
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 182.7 cu-in / 2994.0 cc
Engine | Power
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
66.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
284 Nm / 209.5 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
1994 ~ 2000
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
12%
17%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Great long-term reliability
- Very reliable powertrain
- Very reliable V6 engine
- Clean styling
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Boring
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.