Compare Toyota Century G50 vs Chrysler 300M vs Chrysler Concorde II
Variants
4AT
6AT
2.7
3.5
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
475 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.8 L / 15.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.4 L / 8.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
95.0 L / 25.1 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Helical spring
Tire Size
225/60 R16
225/55 R17
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler LH
Dimensions
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1420 mm / 55.9 in
Size | Length
5270 mm / 207.5 in
5000 mm / 196.9 in
5310 mm / 209.1 in
Size | Width
1890 mm / 74.4 in
1920 mm / 75.6 in
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Weight
1990.0 kg / 4387.2 lbs
Wheelbase
3025 mm / 119.1 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Fuel Economy
20.0 L/100km / 11.8 MPG (urban) | 10.0 L/100km / 23.5 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine
1GZ-FE
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
9.9:1
Engine | Displacement
5.0 L / 305.1 cu-in / 4999.0 cc
Engine | Power
280.0 hp / 208.8 kW @ 5200 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
56.0 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
80.8 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
481 Nm / 354.8 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V12 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
1997 ~ 2016
1998 ~ 2004
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
17%
7%
Pros
- Superb fit and finish
- Outstanding interior appointments
- True elegance
- Smooth V12 engine
- Fully-independent suspensions
- Decent power
- Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
- Limited availability
- Not built for the driver
- Outdated transmission
- Questionable design language
- Average build quality
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Simple rear suspension
- Unique design language
- Unreliable powertrain
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.