HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi S6 C7 vs Audi RS 5 Sportback B9 facelift vs Audi RS 4 B7 Sedan

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 995 L / 35.1 cu-ft
465 L / 16.4 cu-ft
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft ~ 720 L / 25.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
14.7 L / 15.5 qt
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
9.6 L / 10.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
610 kg / 1345 lbs
580 kg / 1279 lbs
610 kg / 1345 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Independent on trapezoidal lever
Multi-link
Independent on trapezoidal lever
Tire Size
255/40 R19
265/35 ZR19 98Y XL
255/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1387 mm / 54.6 in
1415 mm / 55.7 in
Size | Length
4931 mm / 194.1 in
4783 mm / 188.3 in
4589 mm / 180.7 in
Size | Width
1874 mm / 73.8 in | 2086 mm / 82.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1816 mm / 71.5 in
Track Width | Front
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
1569.0 mm / 61.8 in
Weight
1895.0 kg / 4177.8 lbs
1742.0 kg / 3840.5 lbs
1650.0 kg / 3637.6 lbs
Wheel Size
8.5J x 19
9J x 19
8.5J X 18
Wheelbase
2916 mm / 114.8 in
2826 mm / 111.3 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.6 sec
3.9 sec
4.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.4 sec
3.7 sec
4.6 sec
CO2 Emission
225 g/km
209 g/km
329 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.32
0.31
Fuel Economy
9.6 L/100km / 24.5 MPG (combined) | 13.4 L/100km / 17.6 MPG (urban) | 7.5 L/100km / 31.4 MPG (highway)
9.2 L/100km / 25.6 MPG (combined) | 12.2 L/100km / 19.3 MPG (urban) | 7.4 L/100km / 31.8 MPG (highway)
13.7 L/100km / 17.2 MPG (combined) | 19.7 L/100km / 11.9 MPG (urban) | 10.1 L/100km / 23.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine
CEUC
DECA
BNS
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.1:1
10.0:1
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 243.7 cu-in / 3993.0 cc
2.9 L / 176.6 cu-in / 2894.0 cc
4.2 L / 254.0 cu-in / 4163.0 cc
Engine | Power
420.0 hp / 313.2 kW @ 5500-6400 rpm
450.0 hp / 335.6 kW @ 5700-6700 rpm
420.0 hp / 313.2 kW @ 7800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
105.2 hp/L / 1.7 hp/cu-in
155.5 hp/L / 2.5 hp/cu-in
100.9 hp/L / 1.7 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
550 Nm / 405.7 lb-ft @ 1400-5200 rpm
600 Nm / 442.5 lb-ft @ 1900-5000 rpm
430 Nm / 317.2 lb-ft @ 5500 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT S-tronic
Automatic tiptronic
Manual

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2014
2020
2005 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
74%
76%
72%
Pros
  • Torquey V8TT engine
  • Fast 7-speed S-tronic DCT
  • Down to 4.6s 0-100kph time
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good performance
  • Good interior quality
  • Rather good handling
  • Superb suspension setup
  • High-sprung engine with characters
  • Great 6-speed manual transmission
Cons
  • The Avant (wagon) looks better
  • Question mark on long-term reliability
  • Somewhat overstyled
  • No space for any work in the engine bay
  • Engine not the most reliable in the industry

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.