HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi S6 C7 vs Audi RS 7 C8 vs Audi S5 Sportback B9 facelift

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 995 L / 35.1 cu-ft
535 L / 18.9 cu-ft ~ 1390 L / 49.1 cu-ft
430 L / 15.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
12.1 L / 12.8 qt
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
9.5 L / 10.0 qt
6.1 L / 6.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
73.0 L / 19.3 gal
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
610 kg / 1345 lbs
670 kg / 1477 lbs
575 kg / 1268 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 420 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 370 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Independent on trapezoidal lever
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/40 R19
275/35 ZR21 103XL
245/40 R18 97 Y XL
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
11.7 m / 38.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door mild-hybrid Sedan
4-door mild-hybrid Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1424 mm / 56.1 in
1395 mm / 54.9 in
Size | Length
4931 mm / 194.1 in
5009 mm / 197.2 in
4757 mm / 187.3 in
Size | Width
1874 mm / 73.8 in | 2086 mm / 82.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1950 mm / 76.8 in | 2118 mm / 83.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
1668.0 mm / 65.7 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1650.0 mm / 65.0 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Weight
1895.0 kg / 4177.8 lbs
2065.0 kg / 4552.5 lbs
1805.0 kg / 3979.3 lbs
Wheel Size
8.5J x 19
10.5J x 21
8.5J x 18
Wheelbase
2916 mm / 114.8 in
2930 mm / 115.4 in
2825 mm / 111.2 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.6 sec
3.6 sec
4.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.4 sec
3.4 sec
4.7 sec
CO2 Emission
225 g/km
261 ~ 265 g/km
160 ~ 162 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.29
Fuel Economy
9.6 L/100km / 24.5 MPG (combined) | 13.4 L/100km / 17.6 MPG (urban) | 7.5 L/100km / 31.4 MPG (highway)
11.4 L/100km / 20.6 MPG (combined) | 16.1 L/100km / 14.6 MPG (urban) | 8.7 L/100km / 27.0 MPG (highway)
6.1 L/100km / 38.6 MPG (combined) | 7.2 L/100km / 32.7 MPG (urban) | 5.5 L/100km / 42.8 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP-ISC
Euro 6
Engine
CEUC
DJP
DEWB
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.1:1
15.5:1
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 243.7 cu-in / 3993.0 cc
4.0 L / 243.9 cu-in / 3996.0 cc
3.0 L / 181.1 cu-in / 2967.0 cc
Engine | Power
420.0 hp / 313.2 kW @ 5500-6400 rpm
600.0 hp / 447.4 kW @ 6000-6250 rpm
347.0 hp / 258.8 kW @ 3850 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
105.2 hp/L / 1.7 hp/cu-in
150.2 hp/L / 2.5 hp/cu-in
117.0 hp/L / 1.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
91.4 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
550 Nm / 405.7 lb-ft @ 1400-5200 rpm
800 Nm / 590.0 lb-ft @ 2050-4500 rpm
700 Nm / 516.3 lb-ft @ 2500-3100 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged commonrail diesel V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT S-tronic
Automatic tiptronic
Automatic Tiptronic

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2014
2019
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
74%
83%
69%
Pros
  • Torquey V8TT engine
  • Fast 7-speed S-tronic DCT
  • Down to 4.6s 0-100kph time
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent, aggressive styling
  • Very good performance for its size
  • Sophisticated suspension setup
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
Cons
  • The Avant (wagon) looks better
  • Question mark on long-term reliability
  • Too many electronics
  • Exaggerated front grille
  • Performance not that great
  • Styling somewhat busy

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.