Compare Audi A8 D3 vs Toyota Camry 5 facelift vs Toyota Avensis 3 facelift
Variants
3.0 CVT
3.0 CVT LWB
3.0 TDI DPF quattro AT LWB
3.0 TDI PDF quattro AT
3.0 TDI quattro AT
3.2 FSI CVT
3.2 FSI CVT LWB
3.2 FSI quattro AT
3.7 V8 quattro AT
4.0 TDI quattro AT
4.0 TDI quattro AT LWB
4.2 BiTDI quattro AT LWB
4.2 BiTDI quattro DPF AT
4.2 FSI quattro AT
4.2 FSI quattro AT LWB
4.2 quattro AT
4.2 quattro AT LWB
6.0 W12 quattro AT
6.0 W12 quattro AT LWB
2.4 154hp
2.4 154hp AT
2.4 160hp
2.4 160hp AT
3.0 190hp AT
3.0 210hp AT
3.3 210hp AT
3.3 225hp AT
1.6
1.8
1.8 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0 D-4D
2.2 D-4D
2.2 D-CAT
2.2 D-CAT 150hp AT
2.2 D-CAT 177hp
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
472 L / 16.7 cu-ft
509 L / 18.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
90.0 L / 23.8 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4805 mm / 189.2 in
4710 mm / 185.4 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1810 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
153 ~ 155 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
77%
43%
22%
Pros
- Glorious 4.2 TDI and W12 engine options
- Much improved ZF 6HP transmission
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Much more modern inside
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved 5-speed auto transmission
- Very reliable engines
Cons
- Unreliable range of FSI engines
- Adoption of CVT for FWD
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Uninspiring drive
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.