Compare Audi A7 C7 vs Toyota Camry 5 vs Toyota Avensis 3 facelift
Variants
2.8 FSI CVT
2.8 FSI quattro DCT
3.0 BiTDI quattro AT
3.0 TDI clean diesel quattro AT
3.0 TDI CVT
3.0 TDI quattro DCT
3.0 TDI quattro DCT
3.0 TFSI 300PS quattro DCT
3.0 TFSI 310PS quattro DCT
2.4 152hp
2.4 152hp AT
2.4 157hp
2.4 157hp AT
3.0 186hp AT
3.0 192hp AT
3.0 210hp AT
3.3 225hp AT
1.6
1.8
1.8 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0 D-4D
2.2 D-4D
2.2 D-CAT
2.2 D-CAT 150hp AT
2.2 D-CAT 177hp
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
535 L / 18.9 cu-ft ~ 1390 L / 49.1 cu-ft
509 L / 18.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Independent on trapezoidal lever
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
137 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1420 mm / 55.9 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4710 mm / 185.4 in
Size | Width
1911 mm / 75.2 in
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1810 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1644.0 mm / 64.7 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1635.0 mm / 64.4 in
Wheelbase
2914 mm / 114.7 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
153 ~ 155 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
62%
42%
22%
Pros
- Interesting range of V6 engines
- Good ZF 8HP transmission
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Great long-term reliability
- Very reliable engines
Cons
- No manual transmission offered
- CVT for FWD models to be avoided
- Less interior space than the A6
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Uninspiring drive
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.