Compare Audi A4 B6 vs Nissan Teana J32 vs Nissan Altima L31

Variants
1.6
1.8T 150hp
1.8T 150hp CVT
1.8T 150hp quattro
1.8T 163hp
1.8T 163hp CVT
1.8T 163hp quattro
1.8T 170hp
1.8T 170hp CVT
1.8T 170hp quattro
1.8T 170hp quattro AT
1.8T 190hp
1.8T 190hp quattro
1.9 TDI 101hp
1.9 TDI 115hp
1.9 TDI 130hp
1.9 TDI 130hp CVT
1.9 TDI 130hp quattro
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0 FSI 150hp
2.4
2.4 CVT
2.5 TDI 155hp
2.5 TDI 155hp CVT
2.5 TDI 163hp
2.5 TDI 163hp CVT
2.5 TDI 180hp quattro
2.5 TDI 180hp quattro AT
3.0
3.0 CVT
3.0 quattro
3.0 quattro AT
2.5
3.5
2.5
2.5 AT
3.5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 720 L / 25.4 cu-ft
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
550 kg / 1213 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/65 R16
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1428 mm / 56.2 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4548 mm / 179.1 in
4850 mm / 190.9 in
4860 mm / 191.3 in
Size | Width
1772 mm / 69.8 in
1800 mm / 70.9 in
1790 mm / 70.5 in
Track Width | Front
1528.0 mm / 60.2 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2775 mm / 109.3 in
2800 mm / 110.2 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.1 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.7 sec

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Euro 3
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2008 ~ 2013
2002 ~ 2006

Reviews

Neofiliac score
47%
35%
12%
Pros
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Improved exterior styling
  • Good interior appointments
  • Good exterior styling for the time
Cons
  • CVT for FWD
  • Unreliable automatic transmissions
  • Still very front-heavy
  • Some oil consumption issues
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with CVT
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.