Compare Nissan Maxima A34 vs Nissan Maxima A33B vs Nissan Sentra B15
Variants
3.5
3.5 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
3.0
3.0 AT
3.5
3.5 AT
1.8
2.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft
329 L / 11.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
452 kg / 996 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Spring Strut
Spring Strut
Helical spring
Tire Size
225/55 R17
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
1410 mm / 55.5 in
Size | Length
4920 mm / 193.7 in
4509 mm / 177.5 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
1710 mm / 67.3 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
Weight
1610.0 kg / 3549.4 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2535 mm / 99.8 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.8 sec
Fuel Economy
11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Power
268.0 hp / 199.8 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
76.6 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
345 Nm / 254.5 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2008
2000 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
6%
16%
14%
Pros
- Improved exterior styling
- Rather spacious inside
- Clean styling
- Very lightweight
- Good reliability record
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad suspension options
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No RB series engines
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.