Compare Nissan Altima L32 vs Nissan Sentra B16 vs Nissan Sentra B15
Variants
2.5
2.5 CVT
3.5
1.8
2.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
433 L / 15.3 cu-ft
371 L / 13.1 cu-ft
329 L / 11.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
450 kg / 992 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Independent, spring
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Helical spring
Tire Size
215/55 R17
205/60R16
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1471 mm / 57.9 in
1512 mm / 59.5 in
1410 mm / 55.5 in
Size | Length
4821 mm / 189.8 in
4567 mm / 179.8 in
4509 mm / 177.5 in
Size | Width
1796 mm / 70.7 in
1790 mm / 70.5 in
1710 mm / 67.3 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Weight
1295.0 kg / 2855.0 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2535 mm / 99.8 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.8 sec
Fuel Economy
8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (urban) | 6.9 L/100km / 34.1 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
235.0 km/h / 146.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
9.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Power
135.0 hp / 100.7 kW @ 5200 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
90.1 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
191 Nm / 140.9 lb-ft
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Manual
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2012
2006 ~ 2012
2000 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
9%
3%
14%
Pros
- Reliable I4 engines
- Very lightweight
- Good reliability record
Cons
- Basic suspension setup
- Unreliable CVT
- Questionable styling
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Questionable styling
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.