Compare Kia Optima 2 facelift vs Kia Cadenza vs Kia Stinger facelift

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 CRDi
2.4
2.7 AT
2.4 MPI
2.7 MPI 166hp
2.7 MPI 200hp
3.3 GDI 297hp
3.5 MPI 290hp
2.5 T-GDi
2.5 T-GDi AWD
3.3 T-GDi 361
3.3 T-GDi 373
3.3 T-GDi 373 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 816 L / 28.8 cu-ft
451 L / 15.9 cu-ft
406 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1114 L / 39.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
370 kg / 816 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/65 R16
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.1 m / 36.3 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
5-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
1400 mm / 55.1 in
Size | Length
4800 mm / 189.0 in
4965 mm / 195.5 in
4830 mm / 190.2 in
Size | Width
1805 mm / 71.1 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in
1870 mm / 73.6 in
Track Width | Front
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1613.0 mm / 63.5 in
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
1619.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2845 mm / 112.0 in
2905 mm / 114.4 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.8 sec
4.7 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Fuel Economy
9.4 L/100km / 25.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph
269.0 km/h / 167.1 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 2
Euro 6d
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
38%
57%
Pros
  • Good towing capacity
  • More imposing styling
  • Strong exterior styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Robust powertrain lineup
  • Good styling
  • Decent performance
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Basic suspension setup with MacPherson front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.