Compare Kia Optima vs Kia Rio 4 Sedan vs Kia Cadenza
Variants
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0 136hp
2.0 136hp AT
2.0 149hp
2.0 149hp AT
2.5
2.5 AT
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 151hp
2.4 151hp AT
2.5 AT
2.7 AT
1.6
1.6 AT
2.4 MPI
2.7 MPI 166hp
2.7 MPI 200hp
3.3 GDI 297hp
3.5 MPI 290hp
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
451 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
185/65 R15
215/65 R16
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
11.1 m / 36.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4384 mm / 172.6 in
4965 mm / 195.5 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1725 mm / 67.9 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
1613.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1529.0 mm / 60.2 in
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2581 mm / 101.6 in
2845 mm / 112.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.8 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Fuel Economy
9.4 L/100km / 25.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 2
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
11.0:1
10.6:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Power
130.0 hp / 96.9 kW @ 6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
81.7 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
161 Nm / 118.7 lb-ft @ 4850 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2017 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
20%
19%
38%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Small turning circle
- Strong exterior styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Robust powertrain lineup
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Poor safety rating
- Basic suspension setup
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Basic suspension setup with MacPherson front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.