Compare Volkswagen Passat B5.5 vs Chrysler 200 II vs Chrysler Concorde II

Volkswagen Passat B5.5

Chrysler 200 II

Chrysler Concorde II

Volkswagen Passat B5.5Chrysler 200 IIChrysler Concorde II
Variants
1.6
1.8T 150hp
1.8T 150hp AT
1.8T 170hp
1.8T 170hp AT
1.9 TDI 100hp
1.9 TDI 100hp AT
1.9 TDI 130hp 4Motion
1.9 TDI 130hp 5MT
1.9 TDI 130hp 6MT
1.9 TDI 130hp AT
2.0
2.3
2.3 4Motion
2.3 AT
2.5 TDI 4Motion
2.5 TDI 4Motion AT
2.8 4Motion
2.8 4Motion AT
4.0 4Motion
4.0 4Motion AT
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited

Reviews

Neofiliac score62%29%7%
Pros
  • Very interesting W8 and VR5 engine options
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Much improved styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • 9-speed automatic transmission
  • No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
  • Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Simple rear suspension
  • Unique design language
  • Unreliable powertrain

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.