Compare Ford Focus 3 Sedan facelift vs Ford Mondeo 3 Liftback vs Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback
Variants
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 100hp stop/start
1.0T 125hp
1.0T 125hp stop/start
1.5D 120hp
1.5D 95hp
1.5T 150hp
1.5T 150hp stop/start
1.5T 182hp
1.5T 182hp stop/start
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp stop/start
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp stop/start
1.6T 105hp
1.6T 125hp
1.6T 125hp AT
1.6T 85hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 150hp AT stop/start
2.0D 150hp stop/start
1.6 120
1.6D 115
1.6 EcoBoost 160
1.6 110
1.6 125
1.8D 100
1.8D 125
2.0 EcoBoost 203 AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240 AT
2.0 145
2.0D 115
2.0D 130
2.0D 140
2.0D 140 AT
2.0D 163
2.0D 163 AT
2.2D 175
2.2D 200
2.3 160
2.5 220
1.8 110
1.8 125
1.8 130
2.0 145
2.0 145 AT
2.0D 115
2.0D 115 AT
2.0D 90
2.0D 130
2.0D 130 AT
2.2D 155
2.5 170
2.5 170 AT
3.0 204
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
372 L / 13.1 cu-ft
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 1370 L / 48.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 215/50 R17
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Liftback Sedan
5-door Liftback Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
110 mm / 4.3 in
Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
1500 mm / 59.1 in
1429 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4534 mm / 178.5 in
4731 mm / 186.3 in
Size | Width
1823 mm / 71.8 in
1812 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17
16 in
Wheelbase
2648 mm / 104.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2754 mm / 108.4 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
745 kg / 1642 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
22%
31%
29%
Pros
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption (if we believe it)
- Decent engine options
- Relatively high reliability
- Lots of room inside
- Good value for money
- Easy to work on
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- MacPherson strut front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.