HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Focus 3 Sedan facelift vs Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback vs Ford Focus 3 Sedan facelift

Variants
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 100hp stop/start
1.0T 125hp
1.0T 125hp stop/start
1.5D 120hp
1.5D 95hp
1.5T 150hp
1.5T 150hp stop/start
1.5T 182hp
1.5T 182hp stop/start
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp stop/start
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp stop/start
1.6T 105hp
1.6T 125hp
1.6T 125hp AT
1.6T 85hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 150hp AT stop/start
2.0D 150hp stop/start
1.8 110
1.8 125
1.8 130
2.0 145
2.0 145 AT
2.0D 115
2.0D 115 AT
2.0D 90
2.0D 130
2.0D 130 AT
2.2D 155
2.5 170
2.5 170 AT
3.0 204
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 100hp stop/start
1.0T 125hp
1.0T 125hp stop/start
1.5D 120hp
1.5D 95hp
1.5T 150hp
1.5T 150hp stop/start
1.5T 182hp
1.5T 182hp stop/start
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp stop/start
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp stop/start
1.6T 105hp
1.6T 125hp
1.6T 125hp AT
1.6T 85hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 150hp AT stop/start
2.0D 150hp stop/start

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
372 L / 13.1 cu-ft
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 1370 L / 48.4 cu-ft
372 L / 13.1 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 215/50 R17
205/55 R16
205/55 R16, 215/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Liftback Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
1429 mm / 56.3 in
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4534 mm / 178.5 in
4731 mm / 186.3 in
4534 mm / 178.5 in
Size | Width
1823 mm / 71.8 in
1812 mm / 71.3 in
1823 mm / 71.8 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17
16 in
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2648 mm / 104.3 in
2754 mm / 108.4 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
22%
29%
22%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption (if we believe it)
  • Lots of room inside
  • Good value for money
  • Easy to work on
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption (if we believe it)
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.