Compare Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift vs Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH) Hatchback vs SEAT Toledo 4 (KG)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH) Hatchback

SEAT Toledo 4 (KG)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) faceliftMazda 6 / Atenza II (GH) HatchbackSEAT Toledo 4 (KG)
Variants
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT
1.8
2.0 147
2.0 147 AT
2.0 155 AT
2.0 CD
2.0 155
2.2 CD 129
2.2 CD 163
2.2 CD 180
2.2 CD 185
2.5 170
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.2
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 TDI
1.4 TDI DSG
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG

Reviews

Neofiliac score27%49%13%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good engine lineup
  • Elegantly designed
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Improved DSG transmission
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • GPF ruins many good petrol engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson strut
  • Unconventional shape
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • Stuck with semi-independent suspensions in the rear

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.