Compare Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM) [1.5 Skyactiv-D]

Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM)1.5 Skyactiv-D

Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM)
Variants
1.5 Skyactiv-D
1.5 Skyactiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G Hybrid
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.2 SkyActiv-D AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity6.9 L / 7.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity5.1 L / 5.4 qt
Fuel Capacity51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers5
Payload530 kg / 1168 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | FrontVentilated discs
Brakes | RearDisc
Power SteeringElectric Steering
Tire Size205/60 R16
Turning Circle10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance155 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length4580 mm / 180.3 in
Size | Width1795 mm / 70.7 in | 2053 mm / 80.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Weight1265.0 kg / 2788.8 lbs
Wheel Size16 in
Wheelbase2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h11.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph10.5 sec
CO2 Emission99 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag0.26
Fuel Economy3.8 L/100km / 61.9 MPG (combined) | 4.3 L/100km / 54.7 MPG (urban) | 3.5 L/100km / 67.2 MPG (highway)
Top Speed186.0 km/h / 115.6 mph
Towing Capacity600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain LayoutFront-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission StandardEuro 6
EngineS5-DPTS, S5-DPTR
Engine | Bore76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio14.8:1
Engine | Displacement1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1498.0 cc
Engine | Power105.0 hp / 78.3 kW @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output70.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke82.6 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque270 Nm / 199.1 lb-ft @ 1600-2500 rpm
Engine | TypeTurbocharged commonrail diesel inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears6-speed
Transmission | TypeManual

Production

Availability2016 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score35%
Pros
  • Smart exterior and interior design
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved long-term reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.