Compare Mazda 3 BL Sedan vs Chrysler Sebring Sedan JS vs Chrysler LHS 2
Variants
1.6D 5MT
1.6D 6MT
1.6
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 185PS
2.5
2.5 AT
2.0 6MT
2.0 4AT
2.2D 6MT
2.2D 4AT
2.4 6MT
2.4 4AT
2.7 6MT
2.7 4AT
3.5 6MT
3.5 4AT
3.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
441 L / 15.6 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
475 kg / 1047 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/55 R18
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler JS platform
Dimensions
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1497 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4850 mm / 190.9 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1890 mm / 74.4 in
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2767 mm / 108.9 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.1 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
L5-VE
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 214.7 cu-in / 3518.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
1999 ~ 2001
Reviews
Neofiliac score
41%
12%
18%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Good towing capacity
- Fully-independent suspensions
- Lots of interior space
- Some love the quirky design
Cons
- Not as smart looking as the hatchback
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Questionable design decisions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Uninspiring handling
- Poor reliability and build quality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.