Compare Subaru Legacy BL vs Chrysler 200 II vs Chrysler LHS 2
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0R
2.0R AT
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0R
3.0R AT
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
3.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
433 L / 15.3 cu-ft
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
475 kg / 1047 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.8 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson Strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/55 R17
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
147 mm / 5.8 in
Size | Height
1425 mm / 56.1 in
1491 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4665 mm / 183.7 in
4884 mm / 192.3 in
Size | Width
1730 mm / 68.1 in
1871 mm / 73.7 in
1890 mm / 74.4 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2742 mm / 108.0 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.1 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 214.7 cu-in / 3518.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
1999 ~ 2001
Reviews
Neofiliac score
41%
29%
18%
Pros
- Interesting range of H4 and H6 engine choices
- Good towing capacity
- Powerful symmetric AWD system
- Much improved styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- 9-speed automatic transmission
- No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
- Lots of interior space
- Some love the quirky design
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Limited by MacPherson front suspensions
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Uninspiring handling
- Poor reliability and build quality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.