Compare Chevrolet Cruze 2 Sedan vs Renault Laguna III vs Renault Talisman facelift
Variants
1.4T
1.4T AT
1.6D
1.6D AT
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro5
1.5 dCi Euro5 AT
1.6
2.0
2.0 dCi 130
2.0 dCi 131
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 dCi 175 Euro5
2.0 Euro5
2.0 Turbo AT
GT 2.0 dCi 150
GT 2.0 dCi 173
GT 2.0 dCi 173 AT
1.3 TCe 4CONTROL EDC
1.3 TCe EDC
1.7 Blue dCi
1.7 Blue dCi 4CONTROL
2.0 Blue dCi 160 4CONTROL EDC
2.0 Blue dCi 160 EDC
2.0 Blue dCi 200 4CONTROL EDC
2.0 Blue dCi 200 EDC
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
394 L / 13.9 cu-ft ~ 419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
608 L / 21.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc, 290x11 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-dependent beam with stabilizer lateral stability, Trailing arm, Coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
225/55 R17 97W, 245/45 R18 100W, 245/40 R19 98Y
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1458 mm / 57.4 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
1463 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4666 mm / 183.7 in
4848 mm / 190.9 in
Size | Width
1791 mm / 70.5 in
1811 mm / 71.3 in
1869 mm / 73.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1527.0 mm / 60.1 in
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1512.0 mm / 59.5 in
1609.0 mm / 63.3 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2756 mm / 108.5 in
2808 mm / 110.6 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6D Temp
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2016 ~ 2019
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
15%
19%
6%
Pros
- Modern design
- Small turning circle
- Elegant styling
- Fuel efficient
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor performance
- Poor build quality
- Bland styling
- Poor suspension setup
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.