Compare Chevrolet Cruze facelift vs Chevrolet Cobalt vs Chevrolet Evanda
Variants
1.4T
1.4T AT
1.7D
2.0D
2.0D AT
2.2 141PS
2.2 141PS AT
2.4 SS
2.0
2.0 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
469 L / 16.6 cu-ft
394 L / 13.9 cu-ft
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
538 kg / 1186 lbs
490 kg / 1080 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Transverse stabilizer
Spring Strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Leaf spring
Helical spring
Tire Size
205/65 R16
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1477 mm / 58.1 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4603 mm / 181.2 in
4584 mm / 180.5 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
Size | Width
1797 mm / 70.7 in
1725 mm / 67.9 in
1815 mm / 71.5 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1476.0 mm / 58.1 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2624 mm / 103.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
LE5
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2016
2004 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
11%
11%
11%
Pros
- Decent exterior design
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Questionable design
- Not very reliable
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.