Compare Chevrolet Evanda vs Opel Astra H Sedan vs Chevrolet Cruze facelift
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
1.3 CDTI
1.6 115PS
1.6 115PS AT
1.7 CDTI 100PS
1.7 CDTI 110PS
1.8 140PS
1.8 140PS AT
1.4T
1.4T AT
1.7D
2.0D
2.0D AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
469 L / 16.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
538 kg / 1186 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Spring Strut
MacPherson strut
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Rigid axle
Torsion
Tire Size
205/65 R16
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Delta platform
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1458 mm / 57.4 in
1477 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4587 mm / 180.6 in
4603 mm / 181.2 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1797 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1479.0 mm / 58.2 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2703 mm / 106.4 in
2685 mm / 105.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2006
2013 ~ 2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
11%
3%
11%
Pros
- Not very ugly
- Decent exterior design
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Solid axle on the back
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.