HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chevrolet Nubira vs Chevrolet Evanda vs Chevrolet Nubira

Variants
1.4
1.6
1.6 AT
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
1.4
1.6
1.6 AT
1.8
1.8 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1225 L / 43.3 cu-ft
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1225 L / 43.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
485 kg / 1069 lbs
490 kg / 1080 lbs
485 kg / 1069 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson Strut
Spring Strut
MacPherson Strut
Suspension | Rear
Double wishbone
Helical spring
Double wishbone
Tire Size
195/55 R15
205/65 R16
195/55 R15

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1445 mm / 56.9 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4515 mm / 177.8 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4515 mm / 177.8 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1725 mm / 67.9 in
Track Width | Front
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 15
16 in
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2010
2004 ~ 2006
2005 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
13%
11%
13%
Pros
  • Certainly not conspicuous
  • Certainly not conspicuous
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Rather poor fuel economy for the power output
  • Questionable design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Rather poor fuel economy for the power output
  • Questionable design

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.