Compare Volvo S90 vs Chrysler 300M vs Chrysler LHS 2

Volvo S90

Chrysler 300M

Chrysler LHS 2

Volvo S90Chrysler 300MChrysler LHS 2
Variants
D3 Euro6
D3 Euro6d
D3 Euro6 AT
D3 Euro6d AT
D4 Euro6
D4 Euro6d AT
D4 Euro6 AT
D4 Euro6 AWD AT
D5 Euro6 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T4 Euro6 AT
T4 Euro6d AT
T5 Euro6 AT 2018
T5 Euro6d AT
T5 Euro6 AT 2017
T5 254PS AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 Euro6 AWD
T6 Euro6 AWD AT
T8 AWD Hybrid
T8 AWD PHEV
2.7
3.5
3.5

Reviews

Neofiliac score70%17%18%
Pros
  • Elegant exterior design
  • Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Fully-independent suspensions
  • Decent power
  • Lots of interior space
  • Some love the quirky design
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Outdated transmission
  • Questionable design language
  • Average build quality
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Poor reliability and build quality

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.